GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Disagree. Whether or not there is currently any there, I have no idea and certainly no intention of going to find out.
8chan is not a dark web site requiring a special browser, so anyone can click on the link to access the site with a standard browser.- ♦Ian Ma cM♦ (talk to me) 15:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Well it's certainly easy to say that child porn has been posted there, as we do say so in-article. As far as the mainstream media is concerned, 8chan is best known for the controversies over its links to mass shooters. Due to the nature of image boards, it is hard to say if and when child porn is hosted, but 8chan may not always be careful or prompt about removing it. GorillaWarfare (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC) Agreed, 8chan does have a bit of a reputation in this area. I'm inclined to agree with them that we should not be linking to a website where we know child porn is hosted while Wikipedia is not censored, we also don't want to be directing our readers towards viewing content that could put them into legal trouble (not to mention the personal moral implications of viewing such content). Some IP editors have recently begun edit warring over the inclusion of the external link to 8chan, so I figured I'd start a discussion here. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. Alternative Views Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative Views Template:WikiProject Alternative Views Alternative Views articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. Freedom of speech Wikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speech Template:WikiProject Freedom of speech Freedom of speech articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale. Websites Wikipedia:WikiProject Websites Template:WikiProject Websites Websites articles To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options to not see an image. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. Content must be written from a neutral point of view.
4chan pdf search free#
Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. You may wish to ask factual questions about 8chan at the Reference desk. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. This page is not a forum for general discussion about 8chan. Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them, including this article.
0 kommentar(er)
